Jury Decision Making in a Child Sexual Abuse Case (no real crime example)
23 March 2016
This study investigates jury decision making within the England and Wales Judicial System.
It aims to distinguish the degree of variation between jurors evaluating the same case of child sexual abuse.
Descriptions could be disturbing for younger or vulnerable individuals.
Keywords
Ethical approval
This study was submitted for approval to the Psychology Research Ethics Panel of the University of Kent. It has been designed in accordance to the British Psychological Society’s code of ethics. The ethics application for this study was accepted on the 1st of March 2016. Ethics ID: 20153683
About the researcher
The researcher has a BSc (hons) degree in Psychology with Criminology from Nottingham Trent University, and is a current MSc Forensic Psychology student at the University of Kent, Canterbury.
